HBOT Conversations:
Tom Fox (Part 1)
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years, and has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. Tom is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita-RTP team in 2022 as the Safety Director, and is joining us in a 2-part series to discuss the history of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and dive into his personal experience healing patients with HBOT.
Watch the Podcast
We appreciate HBOT historian, Tom Fox, returning to HBOT News to dive in deeper to the history of Hyperbarics, which we can date back to the 1660s!
Tom explains that in the 1830s, the first clinical use of hyperbarics was used and introduced, this revived Nathaniel Henshaw’s concept of Hyperbaric treatments. Nathaniel Henshaw, a clergyman, built a sealed chamber in 1662. Henshaw believed that the application of higher pressure (hyperbaria) was good to treat acute conditions, and that lower pressure (hypobaria) would be better to treat chronic diseases.

1662, Henshaw’s “Domicilium” hyperbaric chamber
This is an interesting fact, because now we’re learning that the cyclic use of hyperbaria (or relative hyperbaria) and hypobaria is very intriguing in what it’s doing from the standpoint of physiology. Tom mentions Dr. Efrati and his group of researchers have been at the forefront of looking at this, and are doing a phenominal job of conducting the hyperbaric studies and getting the hyperbaric education out there. There’s been very limited commitment to do this, he commends Dr. Efrati and his group at Tel Aviv for all they do for the HBOT industry. What you will witness throughout the history of hyperbarics is that they’ve used slightly pressurized room air, and that’s important to know because the slightly pressurized room air has consistently been assumed not to have any effect. It’s even offered up as a control in many of the studies, like the placebo. But the problem is when the placebo helps and the treatment helps, it’s easy to say that the reason both groups are getting better is because of the “participation effect”, or it being “in their heads”. And Dr. Efrati is bringing all this to light. This information is also changing the way the HBOT industry looks at the application of air breaks within the protocols. The use of air breaks was thought to fight oxygen toxicity, but now it’s used to establish a relative hypoxia without going into hypoxic conditions. Host di Girolamo then breaks all of that information down for the viewer to better understand…
So to paraphrase that, you’re breathing pure oxygen and also now you’re breathing air, your body says, ‘oh, oxygen’s depleting, you’re suffocating.’ All these mechanisms occur in your physiology, and then the body’s like, ‘Oh, no, everything’s okay. We have plenty of oxygen.’ So that five minute air break triggers that, and then he’s doing it, I think, three or four times in a 90 minute treatment and it ends up being therapeutic.
Continuing down the timeline of HBOT and fascinating discoveries in the 1800s, Tom Fox brings up a series of articles, Lectures on The Compressed Air Bath and its uses in the treatment of disease, that appeared in the British Medical Journal, dated April 18th, 1885 by a doctor, Theodore Williams. Tom reads the first paragraph from the first article:
“The use of atmospheric air under different degrees of barometric pressure in the treatment of disease is one of the most important advances in modern medicine. When we consider the simplicity of the agent, the exact method by which it is applied, and the precision with which it can be regulated to the requirements of each individual, we are astonished that in England, this method of treatment has been so little used.” – Theodore Williams
That was almost 150 years ago. Back then they were just taking air and putting you under pressure. Now it’s a breakthrough medical treatment, and it’s still not being used in the manner that it could/should be. Almost 200 years ago we were on the cutting edge of medicine! And today we still have to fight to explain that even slightly pressurized room air has a therapeutic benefit — using pressure for healing purposes has literally been happening since the 1600s.

Apparently, Cunningham had some difficulty justifying it all by scientific standards, and this was a very new concept in US medicine. The world had never seen anything like it! Unfortunately, Cunningham fell victim toa unusual amount of scrutiny, and was eventually shut down with the chamber being sold for scrap metal during World War II.
So many people now see the value in Cunningham’s efforts and what he contributed to the HBOT industry. Finally, his work can be interpreted as vindication of the God-given miracle of oxygen and pressure to heal our bodies and minds.
Guests

Thomas M. Fox, MAS,MS, CHT - Safety Director at Extivita RTP & Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years. During this time, he has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. He has provided contract hyperbaric services since 1997. Prior to accepting his current position in Quebec, Canada, Mr. Fox served as the Chief of the Atmospherics Branch of the U.S. Army School of Aviation Medicine, Fort Rucker Alabama. In this capacity, he was responsible for hyperbaric/ hypobaric operations and training of US and NATO aviators, flight surgeons and flight medics. Mr. Fox is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita team in 2022 as the Safety Director, helping Extivita to maintain a healthy and safe environment for exceptional patient care.
Subscribe Now, It’s Free!
Recent HBOT News
Healing under pressure: Inside a military hyperbaric chamber
At 16, she had a stroke. At 17, her town burned in the Camp Fire. Now, as her community rebuilds, she's healing thanks to hyperbaric therapy. SACRAMENTO, Calif — February 2, 2017, started off as an ordinary day for the Pipkin Family. Patrick and Stacey Pipkin just...
Clinical Trial – High-flow Oxygen for Vaso-occlusive Pain Crisis
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by recurrent vaso-occlusive pain crisis (VOC),
which may evolve to acute chest syndrome (ACS), the most common cause of death among adult
patients with SCD. Currently, there is no safe and effective treatment to abort VOC or
prevent secondary ACS. Management of VOC mostly involve a symptomatic approach including
hydration, analgesics, transfusion, and incentive spirometry, which was investigated in a
very limited number of patients (<30).
The polymerisation of HbS is one major feature in the pathogenesis of vaso-occlusion. Among
factors determining the rate and extent of HbS polymer formation, the hypoxic stimulus is one
of the most potent and readily alterable. Current guidelines recommend oxygen therapy in
patients with VOC in order to maintain a target oxygen saturation of 95%. Low-flow nasal
oxygen (LFNO) is routinely used to achieve this normoxia approach, particularly in patients
at risk of secondary ACS because they may experience acute desaturation. In contrast, various
case series suggest a potential beneficial role of intensified oxygen therapy targeting
hyperoxia for the management of VOC, particularly with the use of hyperbaric oxygen, but the
latter is difficult to implement in routine clinical practice.
A recent high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) technology allows the delivery of humidified gas at
high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) through nasal cannula. The FiO2 can be adjusted up to
100% (allowing hyperoxia that may reverse sickling) and the flow can be increased up to 60
L/min (which generates positive airway pressure and dead space flushing, that may prevent
evolution of VOC towards ACS by alleviating atelectasis and opioid-induced hypercapnia). In
patients with acute respiratory failure, HFNO has been shown to improve patient's comfort,
oxygenation, and survival as compared to standard oxygen or non-invasive ventilation.
The aim of the present study is to test the efficacy and safety of HFNO for the management of
VOC and prevention of secondary ACS. The investigators will use a multi-arm multi-stage
(MAMS) design to achieve these goals. HFNO will be delivered through AIRVO 2 (Fisher and
Paykel Healthcare, New Zealand), a device that incorporates a turbine allowing its use in
hospital wards.
Clinical Trial – Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplant
Subjects with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are
considered eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant by the transplant team at WCI (Wilmot
Cancer Institute)will be enrolled in the study. Patients will receive Melphalan on day -2 and
HBO (Hyperbaric Oxygen) therapy on day 0 of the transplant. After neutrophil recovery is
documented, the patients will be seen in clinic at least weekly through day +100.

