HBOT Conversations:
Tom Fox (Part 1)
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years, and has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. Tom is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita-RTP team in 2022 as the Safety Director, and is joining us in a 2-part series to discuss the history of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and dive into his personal experience healing patients with HBOT.
Watch the Podcast
We appreciate HBOT historian, Tom Fox, returning to HBOT News to dive in deeper to the history of Hyperbarics, which we can date back to the 1660s!
Tom explains that in the 1830s, the first clinical use of hyperbarics was used and introduced, this revived Nathaniel Henshaw’s concept of Hyperbaric treatments. Nathaniel Henshaw, a clergyman, built a sealed chamber in 1662. Henshaw believed that the application of higher pressure (hyperbaria) was good to treat acute conditions, and that lower pressure (hypobaria) would be better to treat chronic diseases.

1662, Henshaw’s “Domicilium” hyperbaric chamber
This is an interesting fact, because now we’re learning that the cyclic use of hyperbaria (or relative hyperbaria) and hypobaria is very intriguing in what it’s doing from the standpoint of physiology. Tom mentions Dr. Efrati and his group of researchers have been at the forefront of looking at this, and are doing a phenominal job of conducting the hyperbaric studies and getting the hyperbaric education out there. There’s been very limited commitment to do this, he commends Dr. Efrati and his group at Tel Aviv for all they do for the HBOT industry. What you will witness throughout the history of hyperbarics is that they’ve used slightly pressurized room air, and that’s important to know because the slightly pressurized room air has consistently been assumed not to have any effect. It’s even offered up as a control in many of the studies, like the placebo. But the problem is when the placebo helps and the treatment helps, it’s easy to say that the reason both groups are getting better is because of the “participation effect”, or it being “in their heads”. And Dr. Efrati is bringing all this to light. This information is also changing the way the HBOT industry looks at the application of air breaks within the protocols. The use of air breaks was thought to fight oxygen toxicity, but now it’s used to establish a relative hypoxia without going into hypoxic conditions. Host di Girolamo then breaks all of that information down for the viewer to better understand…
So to paraphrase that, you’re breathing pure oxygen and also now you’re breathing air, your body says, ‘oh, oxygen’s depleting, you’re suffocating.’ All these mechanisms occur in your physiology, and then the body’s like, ‘Oh, no, everything’s okay. We have plenty of oxygen.’ So that five minute air break triggers that, and then he’s doing it, I think, three or four times in a 90 minute treatment and it ends up being therapeutic.
Continuing down the timeline of HBOT and fascinating discoveries in the 1800s, Tom Fox brings up a series of articles, Lectures on The Compressed Air Bath and its uses in the treatment of disease, that appeared in the British Medical Journal, dated April 18th, 1885 by a doctor, Theodore Williams. Tom reads the first paragraph from the first article:
“The use of atmospheric air under different degrees of barometric pressure in the treatment of disease is one of the most important advances in modern medicine. When we consider the simplicity of the agent, the exact method by which it is applied, and the precision with which it can be regulated to the requirements of each individual, we are astonished that in England, this method of treatment has been so little used.” – Theodore Williams
That was almost 150 years ago. Back then they were just taking air and putting you under pressure. Now it’s a breakthrough medical treatment, and it’s still not being used in the manner that it could/should be. Almost 200 years ago we were on the cutting edge of medicine! And today we still have to fight to explain that even slightly pressurized room air has a therapeutic benefit — using pressure for healing purposes has literally been happening since the 1600s.

Apparently, Cunningham had some difficulty justifying it all by scientific standards, and this was a very new concept in US medicine. The world had never seen anything like it! Unfortunately, Cunningham fell victim toa unusual amount of scrutiny, and was eventually shut down with the chamber being sold for scrap metal during World War II.
So many people now see the value in Cunningham’s efforts and what he contributed to the HBOT industry. Finally, his work can be interpreted as vindication of the God-given miracle of oxygen and pressure to heal our bodies and minds.
Guests

Thomas M. Fox, MAS,MS, CHT - Safety Director at Extivita RTP & Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years. During this time, he has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. He has provided contract hyperbaric services since 1997. Prior to accepting his current position in Quebec, Canada, Mr. Fox served as the Chief of the Atmospherics Branch of the U.S. Army School of Aviation Medicine, Fort Rucker Alabama. In this capacity, he was responsible for hyperbaric/ hypobaric operations and training of US and NATO aviators, flight surgeons and flight medics. Mr. Fox is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita team in 2022 as the Safety Director, helping Extivita to maintain a healthy and safe environment for exceptional patient care.
Subscribe Now, It’s Free!
Recent HBOT News
Clinical Trial – Comparative Study of the Analgesic Effect of Spinal Anesthesia or Infiltration Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy
Background and Objectives: Postoperative analgesia and early recovery are relevant for
hospital discharge after hemorrhoidectomy. This study investigated the postoperative
analgesic effect with local infiltration compared with spinal block.
Methods: This randomized study included 40 patients aged 18 to 60 years old. Local group (LG)
received local infiltration under general anaesthesia; spinal group (SG) received a
subarachnoid block. LG received general anaesthesia with propofol, atracurium and propofol
infusion as well as a local infiltration of 20 ml 0.75% ropivacaine. SG received 2 ml of 0.5%
hyperbaric bupivacaine. Analgesic supplementation was with 50µg of fentanyl for LG and 1%
lidocaine for SG. There were assessed: postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation,
motor blockade of lower limbs, time to discharge, analgesic dose over 1 week and adverse
effects.
Clinical Trial – Spinal Anesthesia Associated With General Anesthesia in Coronary Artery Bypass
CONTEXT: In patients eligible for coronary artery bypass surgery, anesthesia should provide a
number of conditions that exceed the limits of cardiovascular stability, myocardial
protection and other organs. Moreover, the combination of general anesthesia and spinal
anesthesia lessens the homeostatic, metabolic, hormonal and immunosuppressive changes. The
goal of this research was to evaluate the consumption of fentanyl citrate in intra-operative
in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass under spinal
anesthesia associated with general anesthesia.
METHODS: Clinical, prospective, randomized and double covered study, approved by the Research
Ethics Committee. Fifty-six patients candidates for CABG with CPB, after signing the Terms of
consent, were randomized and divided into two groups: GI – General and GII – General +
subarachnoid. General anesthesia was induced according to the weight of each patient and
maintenance with isoflurane and fentanyl. Spinal anesthesia was induced with 20 mg of 0.5%
hyperbaric bupivacaine and 200 mcg of morphine, the patient is placed in cephalo-position
slope of 45 degrees for 10 minutes in Group II. In the statistical study was performed using
the Mann-Whitney test; the level of statistical significance was set at 5%.
Deep tissue biopsy vs. superficial swab culture, including microbial loading determination, in the microbiological assessment of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs).
Abstract: Thirty-two patients affected by SSTIs including DFIs were enrolled between 2013 and 2014. Superficial swab was obtained before and after cleansing with sterile saline, and after ultrasonic debridement; deep tissue biopsy was obtained from ulcer base. Samples...
