HBOT Conversations:
Tom Fox (Part 2)
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years, and has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. Tom is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita-RTP team in 2022 as the Safety Director, and is joining us in a 2-part series to discuss the history of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and dive into his personal experience healing patients with HBOT.
Watch the Podcast
In Part 2 of Ed di Girolamo’s conversation with Tom Fox, we dive further into the history of hyperbarics and how this all plays a part in where we are today in understanding, administering, and healing patients with HBOT. Part 1 discussed HBOT history up to Cunningham’s ball in the 1920s.
We start our conversation discussing the time when operating rooms were essentially hyperbaric chambers. Tom explains that was before the FDA, and they started using pressurized rooms and oxygen as an alternative method to do heart surgery and replace valves, because if you super-saturate the body during surgery you can extend the length of time that a patient can go without oxygen. The time was upwards of 13 to 15 minutes, allowing the surgeon more time to do valve replacement. This could have been a real game-changer for the HBOT industry, but it was short-lived because the bypass machine replaced hyperbaric operating rooms.
Then in 1963 the HBOT industry had a set-back. President John F. Kennedy had a premature son who had a condition that lead to a hypoxic event (lack of oxygen) following birth. The child was placed in a hyperbaric oxygen chamber at Harvard. Initially, he did very well. But, 60 years ago we didn’t know a lot about the toxic effects and the therapeutic limits of the use of oxygen. He was treated at a much greater pressure than physicians would treat people today, and this little baby was treated for extended time, up to 7 hours! So Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy was seen in a negative light right after that, because as different physicians got involved in it, they said that it was HBOT that killed John F. Kennedy’s baby. That incident made it difficult for the hyperbaric industry to bounce back into a positive light. Yet, there was a saving grace; thankfully around this same time and soon after Europe and the USSR were developing whole systems and procedures to administer HBOT. They had hospitals in a former USSR that was using hyperbarics as their principal treatment; so when physicians here in the US wanted to treat with HBOT, they used a machine to translate a Russian manual, so they could get it right.
Moving forward, a lot of the physicians that were fostering and having great success treating with HBOT came out of the military. Tom explains that he has been in the HBOT industry for a long time, 31 years and he has been in the presence of some of the true pioneers in hyperbarics.
And then the Undersea Medical Society enters the picture…..
Tom explains, “Now in 1967, that’s kind of when the Undersea Medical Society came around, you know, what they did was they go, ‘Okay, this is the Wild West. We need to rein this in and we need to identify the rationale, why we’re doing this so that we can structure this into an offering in medicine, a therapeutic offering into medicine.’ And you had doctors like Dr. Kindwall, Dr. Hart, these are pioneers at the time that were instrumental in the formation of the new Medical Society. You know, that was both a curse and it had a lot of positive effects, too. But the thing was they put hyperbarics and undersea medicine together, and that’s been a problem. It certainly prevents the thought of clinical hyperbarics progressing independently of diving medicine.
Next, the FDA worked together with the Undersea & Hyperbaric Medical Society, and together they produced a committee report that looked at the indications. The indications were a lot more than what we have today, and since then it’s been refined.
Tom stresses that there’s an art to properly using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, and he states the following —
“In the right hands, hyperbarics can do wonderful things. In the wrong hands, most often it won’t do bad things, but it will not have the desired results.”
di Girolamo and Tom Fox further dive into the art of using hyperbarics properly, and even how incorporating things like a good diet and exercise will play just as much of an important part in a person’s health. Tom stresses that HBOT is not a cure in most cases, but it can be an extremely useful tool to help someone get closer to their baseline.
The one thing that has stood the test of time is that no one can deny that HBOT is effective for hypoxia and inflammation. Any indication that has those two conditions associated with it, can be positively affected by using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. He ends this segment encouraging everyone to keep an open mind about the god-given miracle of combining oxygen and pressure.
“I think you’re going to find that whether you’re dealing with something currently or you may be having, you know, something going on that you’re not even aware of, HBOT is not going to hurt you. It’s a good option.”
Guests
Thomas M. Fox, MAS,MS, CHT - Safety Director at Extivita RTP & Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years. During this time, he has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. He has provided contract hyperbaric services since 1997. Prior to accepting his current position in Quebec, Canada, Mr. Fox served as the Chief of the Atmospherics Branch of the U.S. Army School of Aviation Medicine, Fort Rucker Alabama. In this capacity, he was responsible for hyperbaric/ hypobaric operations and training of US and NATO aviators, flight surgeons and flight medics. Mr. Fox is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita team in 2022 as the Safety Director, helping Extivita to maintain a healthy and safe environment for exceptional patient care.
Subscribe Now, It’s Free!
Recent HBOT News
Clinical Trial – Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position
Postoperative delirium is an acute mental syndrome that is caused by diffuse cerebral
dysfunction resulting from the action of predisposing and precipitating factors acting
together. It is associated with an increase in mortality and postoperative morbidity and
prolongs the period of hospitalization of the patient Videolaparoscopic surgery has been
increasingly used as a therapeutic and diagnostic method. In order to have a good
visualization of the anatomical structures on which it will act, it is necessary to introduce
gas into the cavity, a mandatory component known as pneumoperitoneum. This technique gives
special characteristics for the conduction of anesthesia, since the positive intra-abdominal
pressure results in changes in the patient’s physiology. Some types of laparoscopic surgery
require the position of Trendelenburg for better visualization of the operative field. Among
the changes related to this position are the increase in cardiac output and intracranial
pressure.
In order to optimize the anesthetic procedure, anesthetic blocks have been increasingly used,
especially the spinal. The association of general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, followed
by its contraindications is advantageous, because lower doses of anesthetic agents are
necessary for the maintenance of general anesthesia. This association results in an earlier
awakening, a reduction of nausea / vomiting, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay,
cost effectiveness and greater patient satisfaction. As a disadvantage, by associating
general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, patients become susceptible to the adverse events
of spinal anesthesia. Among these, the most common are headache, hypotension, nausea and
vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and tremor. Performing spinal anesthesia with opioids
alone, without the use of local anesthetic is also possible, with morphine being the most
used. The benefit of this variation of technique is analgesia for a period of 12 to 24 hours,
without the cardiovascular consequences resulting from the action of the local anesthetic.
JUSTIFICATION: There are no studies in the literature evaluating The objective of this study
is to analyze if the anesthetic techniques employed, general anesthesia or general anesthesia
associated with subarachnoid block, for videolaparoscopic oncologic surgeries, in
Trendelenburg position, differ in relation to the incidence of delirium in the postoperative
period.
Incense burning smoke sensitizes lung cancer cells to EGFR TKI by inducing AREG expression.
Abstract: Incense burning is common in Asian countries due to the religious beliefs. Environmental exposure to incense burning smoke is a potential risk factor for tumor development and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eastern Asia ethnic origin is...
A diver with immersion pulmonary oedema and prolonged respiratory symptoms.
Abstract: Immersion pulmonary oedema (IPE) is particularly associated with an excessive reaction to exercise and/or cold stress. IPE usually resolves without recompression therapy within a day or two. Herein we report a diver diagnosed with IPE, in whom symptoms...