HBOT Conversations:
Tom Fox (Part 2)
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years, and has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. Tom is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita-RTP team in 2022 as the Safety Director, and is joining us in a 2-part series to discuss the history of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and dive into his personal experience healing patients with HBOT.
Watch the Podcast
In Part 2 of Ed di Girolamo’s conversation with Tom Fox, we dive further into the history of hyperbarics and how this all plays a part in where we are today in understanding, administering, and healing patients with HBOT. Part 1 discussed HBOT history up to Cunningham’s ball in the 1920s.
We start our conversation discussing the time when operating rooms were essentially hyperbaric chambers. Tom explains that was before the FDA, and they started using pressurized rooms and oxygen as an alternative method to do heart surgery and replace valves, because if you super-saturate the body during surgery you can extend the length of time that a patient can go without oxygen. The time was upwards of 13 to 15 minutes, allowing the surgeon more time to do valve replacement. This could have been a real game-changer for the HBOT industry, but it was short-lived because the bypass machine replaced hyperbaric operating rooms.
Then in 1963 the HBOT industry had a set-back. President John F. Kennedy had a premature son who had a condition that lead to a hypoxic event (lack of oxygen) following birth. The child was placed in a hyperbaric oxygen chamber at Harvard. Initially, he did very well. But, 60 years ago we didn’t know a lot about the toxic effects and the therapeutic limits of the use of oxygen. He was treated at a much greater pressure than physicians would treat people today, and this little baby was treated for extended time, up to 7 hours! So Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy was seen in a negative light right after that, because as different physicians got involved in it, they said that it was HBOT that killed John F. Kennedy’s baby. That incident made it difficult for the hyperbaric industry to bounce back into a positive light. Yet, there was a saving grace; thankfully around this same time and soon after Europe and the USSR were developing whole systems and procedures to administer HBOT. They had hospitals in a former USSR that was using hyperbarics as their principal treatment; so when physicians here in the US wanted to treat with HBOT, they used a machine to translate a Russian manual, so they could get it right.
Moving forward, a lot of the physicians that were fostering and having great success treating with HBOT came out of the military. Tom explains that he has been in the HBOT industry for a long time, 31 years and he has been in the presence of some of the true pioneers in hyperbarics.
And then the Undersea Medical Society enters the picture…..
Tom explains, “Now in 1967, that’s kind of when the Undersea Medical Society came around, you know, what they did was they go, ‘Okay, this is the Wild West. We need to rein this in and we need to identify the rationale, why we’re doing this so that we can structure this into an offering in medicine, a therapeutic offering into medicine.’ And you had doctors like Dr. Kindwall, Dr. Hart, these are pioneers at the time that were instrumental in the formation of the new Medical Society. You know, that was both a curse and it had a lot of positive effects, too. But the thing was they put hyperbarics and undersea medicine together, and that’s been a problem. It certainly prevents the thought of clinical hyperbarics progressing independently of diving medicine.
Next, the FDA worked together with the Undersea & Hyperbaric Medical Society, and together they produced a committee report that looked at the indications. The indications were a lot more than what we have today, and since then it’s been refined.
Tom stresses that there’s an art to properly using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, and he states the following —
“In the right hands, hyperbarics can do wonderful things. In the wrong hands, most often it won’t do bad things, but it will not have the desired results.”
di Girolamo and Tom Fox further dive into the art of using hyperbarics properly, and even how incorporating things like a good diet and exercise will play just as much of an important part in a person’s health. Tom stresses that HBOT is not a cure in most cases, but it can be an extremely useful tool to help someone get closer to their baseline.
The one thing that has stood the test of time is that no one can deny that HBOT is effective for hypoxia and inflammation. Any indication that has those two conditions associated with it, can be positively affected by using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. He ends this segment encouraging everyone to keep an open mind about the god-given miracle of combining oxygen and pressure.
“I think you’re going to find that whether you’re dealing with something currently or you may be having, you know, something going on that you’re not even aware of, HBOT is not going to hurt you. It’s a good option.”
Guests

Thomas M. Fox, MAS,MS, CHT - Safety Director at Extivita RTP & Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training
Tom is the Research Physiologist for the Hyperbaric Institute for Research and Training, a division of Island Hyperbaric Centre in Pincourt QC. He has worked in the field of Clinical Hyperbaric Oxygen for the last 30 years. During this time, he has been intimately involved with the implementation and the development of the US Army’s Clinical Hyperbaric Service at Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center. He has provided contract hyperbaric services since 1997. Prior to accepting his current position in Quebec, Canada, Mr. Fox served as the Chief of the Atmospherics Branch of the U.S. Army School of Aviation Medicine, Fort Rucker Alabama. In this capacity, he was responsible for hyperbaric/ hypobaric operations and training of US and NATO aviators, flight surgeons and flight medics. Mr. Fox is a senior army aviator and flew twelve years as a Medical Evacuation Pilot for the US Army.
Tom joined the Extivita team in 2022 as the Safety Director, helping Extivita to maintain a healthy and safe environment for exceptional patient care.
Subscribe Now, It’s Free!
Recent HBOT News
Orbital implant placement using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) stereolithographic surgical template protocol.
Abstract: Surgical implant placement in the orbital region for the support of a prosthesis is challenging due to the thin orbital rim and proximity to vital structures. This article reports the use of a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM)...
Clinical Trial – Haemodynamic Effects During Anorectal Surgery: a Comparison of the Jack -Knife and Lithotomy Position
Background and Goal of Study: Minimal dose of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine is commonly
performed for adult anorectal surgery. This kind of anaesthesia can cause sinus bradycardia
and hypotension wich reason is body position, autonomic nervus system reaction, reflex
reaction even with low levels of sensory block. However, neither the publication of minimal
doses of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine effects of haemodynamic modifications nor their
accuracy was widely discussed. The aim of the study is to make a comparison of the
haemodynamic modifications due to minimal dose of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for adult
anorectal surgery in lithotomy or jack knife position of steering impedance device.
Materials and Methods: Patients will be included which are over then 18 years old, who
underwent anorectal surgery of the benign pathology, requiring spinal anaesthesia, were
admitted in this clinical randomized study, hospitalized in Hospital of Lithuanian University
of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics and agree to participate to this study (written
settlement). All patients were implicitly divided in to 4 groups by the position will be
operating (lithotomy or jack knife position and by American Society of Anaesthesiologists
(ASA) clas I-II and III-IV). Technique of anaesthesia were strictly standardized by protocol.
All patients were premedicated with oral diazepam 5mg and diclofenac 100mg 60min before
operation. After arrival in the operating theater peripheral vein 18 or 20G catheter was
inserted, infusion therapy were started with crystalloid 5-7ml/kg/hour. Standard monitoring
was used, including noninvasive arterial blood pressure (BP), electrocardiography (ECG),
heart rate, peripheral oxygenation. Circulatory changes were recorded impedance device. 2
single-neck sensors connected vertically on both sides of the neck just below the ears lobe.
Another pair of sensors attached on both sides of the chest processus xiphoid axillary line
level. Thorax allows a variable electrical current, it travels through the lowest resistance
(blood-filled aorta) and resistance is measured. For each heart contraction during changes in
blood volume and velocity. Accordingly, replacing the resistors obtained by impedance
settings.
Haemodynamic variables were recorded in patients in the use of impedance cardiograph:
1. arrives in the operating room;
2. seating on the operating table;
3. following the puncture;
4. 10 min after spinal puncture;
5. was laid in lithotomy or jack knife position;
6. in the beginning and the end of the operation;
7. patient was placed in the bed.
Each measurement was monitoring and recorded the following data( ar findings):
– Cardiac output (CO);
– Systemic vascular resistance (SVR);
– Systolic index (SI)
– Cardiac index (CI);
– Acceleration index (ACI);
– Heart rate (HR);
– Non-invasive systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) blood pressure;
– Peripheral oxygenation (SpO2); Patients were placed in the sitting position on the slab
(operating table) back to the doctor. Dural puncture was made at L3-L4 or L4-L5 with 27G
Tamanho spinal needle ( BBraun, Germany) by medial punction in aseptic condition, before
the punction was injected lidocaine 1% subcutaneous. 0.5% 4mg of heavy bupivacaine and
0.01% 10µg fentanyl were injected over 2 minutes after free flow of cerebrospinal fluid
was obtained. After sitting for 10 minutes ( sensory block was checked by the dermatomes
with the methods of cold sensitivity) patients were asked to lie in the position wich
operation will be done (lithotomy or jack knife position).
After 20 min. surgery was started. When anaesthesia was imperfect, 25-100µg of fentanyl was
given IV. General anaesthesia will be give in case of failure . These cases will be value
like a failure, patients will be exclude from the study.
Clinically significant hypotension will be define as a mean arterial blood pressure and heart
rate decrease of 20% below baseline values. Systolic arterial blood pressure will reduce to
90mmHG limit, intravenous ephedrine 5-10 mg will be injected. If heart rate will reduce to 45
bpm, bradycardia will be treated with atropine 0,5 mg IV.
Combined free tissue transfer for the management of composite Achilles defects: functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following thigh-based vascularized reconstruction with a neotendon construct.
Abstract: Functional outcomes and quality-of-life measures following salvage reconstruction of composite Achilles/posterior leg defects are limited. We present our experience with combined Achilles defect reconstruction utilizing free tissue transfer with...
