Clinical Trial – Comparison of Clorotekal and Bupivacaine for Short Obstetric Surgery

The following obstetric procedures are commonly performed with spinal anesthesia on labor and
delivery: bilateral tubal ligation, external cephalic version, cerclage insertion, cerclage
removal, minimally invasive fetal surgery, and evacuation of retained products of conception.
Bupivacaine is currently the standard spinal medication for these procedures because of its
long history of safe use, its low incidence of transient neurologic symptoms, and its ability
to provide a dependable, dense block with a high degree of maternal satisfaction. While
bupivacaine has the aforementioned advantages, it unfortunately has a long duration of
action, up to 240-380 minutes, which far exceeds the time necessary to complete most
obstetric procedures. Clorotekal®, the first Food and Drug Administration approved
chloroprocaine solution created for spinal injection, is a potential alternative. When
compared with bupivacaine spinals, chloroprocaine spinals have been shown to facilitate
clinically significant shorter times to resolution of motor and sensory block, first
ambulation, micturition, and discharge readiness. The objective of this study is to determine
if a strategy of spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine will reduce the duration of motor
block, compared with equivalent block with hyperbaric bupivacaine..

Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a major cause of chronic, neurological disability, with a significant long-term disability burden, often requiring comprehensive rehabilitation. To systematically evaluate evidence from published Cochrane Reviews of clinical trials to summarise the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation interventions for people with MS (pwMS), to improve patient outcomes, and to highlight current gaps in knowledge. We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to December 2017, to identify Cochrane Reviews that assessed the effectiveness of organised rehabilitation interventions for pwMS. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included reviews, using the Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) tool, and the quality of the evidence for reported outcomes, using the GRADE framework. Overall, we included 15 reviews published in the Cochrane Library, comprising 164 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four controlled clinical trials, with a total of 10,396 participants. The included reviews evaluated a wide range of rehabilitation interventions, including: physical activity and exercise therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), whole-body vibration, occupational therapy, cognitive and psychological interventions, nutritional and dietary supplements, vocational rehabilitation, information provision, telerehabilitation, and interventions for the management of spasticity.